![]() This is more appropriate because the question under consideration is what would count as machine intelligence. This is because the features of intelligence upon which it relies are resourcefulness and a critical attitude to one's habitual responses thus the test's applicablity is not restricted to any particular species, nor does it presume any particular capacities. ![]() The two tests can yield different results it is the first, neglected test that provides the more appropriate indication of intelligence. I show here that the first test described in that much-discussed paper is in fact not equivalent to the second one, which has since become known as `the Turing Test'. OL9187195W Page_number_confidence 93.48 Pages 370 Partner Innodata Ppi 300 Rcs_key 24143 Republisher_date 20200926171214 Republisher_operator Republisher_time 354 Scandate 20200923071012 Scanner Scanningcenter cebu Scribe3_search_catalog isbn Scribe3_search_id 9780262692939 Tts_version 4.On a literal reading of `Computing Machinery and Intelligence', Alan Turing presented not one, but two, practical tests to replace the question `Can machines think?' He presented them as equivalent. ![]() Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 14:07:50 Associated-names Shieber, Stuart M Boxid IA1946321 Camera Sony Alpha-A6300 (Control) Collection_set printdisabled External-identifier ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |